Workflow analysis
Mapping a repetitive process, finding bottlenecks and deciding what is worth automating.
Process mapping / feasibilityI set up AI assistants and agents that work inside your team’s own tools, with your data kept inside your organisation. First we check where AI helps at all, and people keep control of every result.
Useful automation begins with a clear picture of the process.
Many processes need no AI agent. A better checklist, a simple integration or clearer ownership often solves the problem.
First we look at where information gets stuck, where time goes and which decisions need a person. Then we pick a realistic pilot, agree on what success looks like and decide whether AI is the right tool.
Beyond advice, I set up working AI assistants and agents for teams and for individual managers. They read the documents your team already produces, sum them up and turn them into tasks inside the tools you use every day.
When your data must not leave the company network or your organisation’s own cloud workspace, the assistant runs there too. I connect it to your files, mail and task tracker, set what it may see and do, and tune it until it saves real time.
You want every weekly report read, summed up and turned into tasks, and the data must stay inside your organisation. This is how such an assistant could work.
A new sales, project or finance report lands in a shared folder or an inbox the assistant watches.
A language model on your own server or in your organisation’s cloud account pulls out key figures, changes since the last report and open risks.
You get a short summary, and suggested tasks appear in your task tracker with an owner and a due date.
Tasks go out only after someone on the team approves them, and every step is logged.
The example shows a setup I can build and describes no finished client project. Whether a fully local model fits depends on your hardware, the volume of documents and the quality you need, and a short pilot answers that.
Discuss an assistant for your teamIndependent support for teams that are trying AI automation. What I can build depends on system access, available integrations, security requirements and the agreed scope.
Mapping a repetitive process, finding bottlenecks and deciding what is worth automating.
Process mapping / feasibilitySetting up a small pilot for document processing, request routing or recurring reports when the needed integrations exist.
Workflow configuration / integrationsPersonal and team assistants, agent workflows and internal knowledge search, set up inside your own environment with clear tool permissions.
Private assistants / RAG / agentsAdding validation, independent checks, human approval and exception handling before a wider rollout.
Evaluation / monitoring / safeguardsThese examples show how a team could organise the work. They are concepts. None of them describes a finished client project or a live integration.
The system sorts each new request by topic and urgency, and an employee reviews the exceptions before anything goes out or changes.
CONCEPT ONLY. NO AGENT RUNS HERE.A focused conversation about the task, current tools, volume, risks and what a useful result would look like.
We define inputs, outputs and approval steps, then build a small working prototype with suitable tools.
We test real examples, review the failures and decide what needs more work, monitoring or human review.
You don't need a technical brief. Tell me what your team repeats every day, which tools you use and what you'd like to improve. First we check whether automation makes sense at all.
Please don't share passwords, customer records, proprietary files or other confidential information in a first message. I can't guarantee an implementation or any savings.
I'll open the form here once I set up secure sending. Until then, describe your workflow on LinkedIn.
Please don't share passwords, customer records or confidential files in a first message. LinkedIn's own terms apply there.